Feedbucket vs Userback

Feedbucket is for studios with many clients; Userback is for teams starting free and growing into replay. Feedbucket is $39 a month billed annually for 2 team members and unlimited client reporters, with no free tier. Userback starts free for 2 seats and 2 projects; session replay and console arrive on Business at $79 billed annually.

  • Reviewed
  • 7 pending verification
Feedbucket

Feedbucket

A website feedback tool for agencies, built so the client never needs an account and the agency works from inside Asana or Jira rather than from the tool itself.

Free plan
None. A 14 day trial, no card required
Paid plan entry
Pro, $49 a month or $39 billed annually, for 2 team members and unlimited projects
Projects
Unlimited on every plan
Userback

Userback

A feedback platform with a four-step ladder, opening up AI insights, replay and mobile SDKs as a team moves up it.

Free plan
Free Forever: 2 seats, 2 projects, and feedback stays visible for 7 days
Paid plan entry
Team, $39 a month or $29 billed annually, for 5 seats and 5 projects
Projects
2 on Free, 5 on Team, 25 on Business, 50 on Business Plus

What are Feedbucket and Userback built for?

Feedbucket

Feedbucket

Feedbucket is a website feedback tool for web agencies. The client leaves feedback on the staging site without an account or an extension, video is recorded in the browser, and the agency manages the queue from inside its tracker; Asana, Jira, ClickUp, Trello, Basecamp, Monday, GitHub, Linear and GitLab connect from Pro. Client reporters and projects are unlimited on every plan. There is no free plan, and the ladder goes from two team members to twenty five.

Userback

Userback

Userback is a feedback platform built around a widget with a four-step ladder: two seats and two projects free, then Team, Business and Business Plus adding MCP connectors, AI insights, session replay, developer tools, a mobile SDK and support-desk integrations with Intercom and Zendesk. On the free plan, feedback disappears from view after seven days.

How do Feedbucket and Userback compare head to head?

Dimension
Feedbucket Feedbucket
Userback Userback
Free plan
None. A 14 day trial, no card required
Free Forever: 2 seats, 2 projects, and feedback stays visible for 7 days
Paid plan entry
Pro, $49 a month or $39 billed annually, for 2 team members and unlimited projects
Team, $39 a month or $29 billed annually, for 5 seats and 5 projects
Projects
Unlimited on every plan
2 on Free, 5 on Team, 25 on Business, 50 on Business Plus
Reporters
Client reporters unlimited on every plan, no account needed
Seats are counted on Free and Team; the plan counts stop from Business
Session replay
Not stated anywhere on its pricing, features or home pages Pending verification
Business plan, $99 a month or $79 billed annually
Console and network capture
Console logs listed under Business, $89 a month or $72 billed annually; network requests not stated Pending verification
Business plan, listed as developer tools
Screen recording
Video feedback, recorded in the browser by the reporter, from Pro
Video recording, plan not stated on the pricing page Pending verification
Issue tracker integrations
Asana, Jira, ClickUp, Trello, Basecamp, Monday, GitHub, Linear, GitLab and more, from Pro
Not itemised on the pricing page Pending verification
Support-desk integrations
Not stated on the pricing page Pending verification
Intercom and Zendesk
MCP server
An MCP connector, listed from the Pro plan
MCP connectors from Team, for Claude, ChatGPT and Cursor
AI features
Not stated on the pricing page Pending verification
AI insights and sentiment from Business
Mobile SDK
Not stated on the pricing page Pending verification
Business Plus

Every claim about Feedbucket and Userback comes from each vendor's own public materials, read on 13 September 2026. Products change; check each vendor's site before deciding. Pending cells are unresearched, not zero.

When should you choose Feedbucket, and when Userback?

Feedbucket

Choose Feedbucket when

  • Clients are the reporters and there are many of them. Feedbucket's client reporters and projects are unlimited on every plan; Userback counts seats and projects on its lower tiers.
  • You want the queue in Asana or Jira and the tool out of the way. Feedbucket names those trackers on its entry plan and is built around never opening the tool itself.
  • The client should record the screen. Feedbucket's video feedback is recorded in the browser from Pro; Userback's pricing page lists video recording without naming the plan.
Userback

Choose Userback when

  • You want to start for nothing. Userback's Free Forever carries two seats and two projects; Feedbucket has no free plan after its trial.
  • You want replay and console logs on a ladder you can climb. Userback puts both on Business at $79 a month billed annually; Feedbucket does not state replay or network capture on any plan.
  • Your support team lives in Intercom or Zendesk. Userback connects both; on Feedbucket's pricing page we found neither, so that cell is pending verification.
  • You collect feedback from a native mobile app. Userback ships a mobile SDK on Business Plus; Feedbucket is built for websites.
Notarus

The third option

Where does Notarus fit?

Notarus carries what Userback sells on Business, session replay, console logs and network requests, on its free plan, and what Feedbucket sells on Pro, the trackers, from the same plan, with unlimited seats and 5 projects. Nothing disappears after seven days, and a named client access follows the project without ever being a seat. Every panel action is also an MCP tool.

It has no ladder to climb, and also no top rung. There is no mobile SDK, so Userback's Business Plus stays the answer for a native app, and no Intercom or Zendesk integration. It takes feedback on a live web page only, never a Figma file, a PDF or an image.

The prices are on the pricing page, and there are three of them.

Seats on Free
Unlimited
Projects on Free
5
Replay retention
30 days
Session replay
On Free
Console and network
Every report
MCP server
Every plan

What do buyers ask about Feedbucket vs Userback?

Is Userback cheaper than Feedbucket?

At the entry tier, yes: Userback's Team is $39 a month or $29 billed annually for five seats and five projects, against Feedbucket's Pro at $49 or $39 for two team members and unlimited projects. Userback also has a free plan and Feedbucket does not. The comparison flips for a studio with more than five projects, which Feedbucket does not count.

Which one has session replay?

Userback, on its Business plan at $99 a month or $79 billed annually, alongside the developer tools that capture console and network activity. Feedbucket does not state session replay on its pricing, features or home pages, and lists console logs under Business while its feature pages call them automatic.

Do clients need an account on either?

Not on Feedbucket: client reporters are unlimited on every plan and report from the staging site with nothing to install. Userback's pricing page counts seats on Free and Team and stops counting from Business; a free reporter role of the kind Feedbucket describes is not stated on it, so that comparison is pending verification.

Which one has an MCP connector, Feedbucket or Userback?

Both, from their first paid plans. Userback's MCP connectors begin on Team, $39 a month or $29 billed annually, and are named for Claude, ChatGPT and Cursor; the free plan does not carry them. Feedbucket lists an MCP connector from Pro, $49 a month or $39 billed annually. Neither vendor's connector is on a free tier, which is the one place the two agree. Notarus exposes every panel action as an MCP tool from its free plan, so an agent triages the board without a paid step.

Does Feedbucket connect to Intercom or Zendesk like Userback?

Not that its pricing page states. Userback lists Intercom and Zendesk among its integrations, which is the route for a support team that lives in either. Feedbucket's pricing page names Asana, Jira, ClickUp, Trello, Basecamp, Monday, GitHub, Linear and GitLab, all issue trackers, and no support desk, so that cell is pending verification rather than a no. For a support team the answer today is Userback; for an agency whose queue is a tracker, the gap does not matter.

Or try the third option on the free plan.

5 projects and unlimited seats, session replay included. No card.

<script src="…/widget.js" data-key="pb_pub_…">