Studios reviewing designs and sites with a long list of clients
Standard, $50 a month or $42 billed annually, for 5 members
The closest alternatives to Feedbucket are BugHerd, Marker.io, Ruttl and Notarus. BugHerd is the nearest match for agency work and adds designs, PDFs and images. Marker.io keeps reporters free and unlimited. Ruttl runs a free plan, which Feedbucket does not. Notarus carries console, network and session replay without a paid tier. Feedbucket stays the better answer when two people serve many clients and the work happens inside Asana or Jira.
Studios reviewing designs and sites with a long list of clients
Standard, $50 a month or $42 billed annually, for 5 members
Agencies with many client sites and few internal seats
Starter, $59 a month or $39 billed annually, for 3 users and up to 10 projects
Studios that outgrew two seats but do not need twenty five, and want the console on every report
Pro, $19 a month, for unlimited seats and 20 projects
Teams reviewing design across websites, apps and documents
Pro, $18 a month per user, for 1 admin and up to 50 users
Prices and plan contents read from each vendor's own pricing page on 13 September 2026.
The first reason is that there is nothing to start on. Feedbucket runs a 14 day trial that asks for no card, and after it the cheapest plan is Pro at $49 a month, or $39 billed annually. Working out the annual total is its own problem: the pricing page states $470 for Pro in one block and $396 in another, so a reader has to pick between two figures the same page publishes.
The second is the gap in the middle of the ladder. Pro carries 2 team members and Business carries 25, with no tier between them, so the third person to join a two-person studio moves the bill from $49 a month to $89.
The third is where the console sits. The pricing table lists console logs under Business, while the feature pages describe them as captured automatically with every report, and nothing on the site settles which of the two governs. A team buying a feedback tool for the console cannot tell from the public pages what the entry plan actually includes.
The fourth is the rest of the technical record. Session replay and network requests are not stated anywhere on its pricing, features or home pages, so a report arrives as a screenshot, or a video the client recorded, with no request log and no session to step through behind it.
A pin-on-the-page feedback tool for agencies and studios, sold by team members with clients thrown in free.
Strength. Unlimited guests and unlimited projects on every plan, and feedback works on Figma designs, PDFs and images rather than only on a live site.
Limitation. The project trackers most teams already run, Jira, Linear, Asana, ClickUp and Monday, are held back to the Premium plan at $150 a month. Extra members cost $8 each a month on top.
A widget and browser extension aimed at agencies reporting bugs on client sites, priced by page views as well as by seat.
Strength. Reporters are free and unlimited, and sending feedback through the widget needs no account at all, so the people filing bugs never count against a seat.
Limitation. Session replay, console logs, network requests and the Jira integration all start at Team, which is $199 a month or $149 billed annually. Starter also caps page views at 5,000 a month.
A widget, a fixed four-stage board, and an MCP server that exposes every action the panel can take.
Strength. Session replay, console, network and environment arrive on the free plan rather than on a paid tier, unlimited seats on every plan including that one, clients follow the work through a portal access that is not a member and never uses a seat, and every panel action is an MCP tool as a shipping rule, so an agent can work the board a person works.
Limitation. No mobile SDK at all, so a native app is out of scope, and no Intercom or Zendesk integration. What it takes feedback on is a live web page and nothing else: no Figma file, no PDF and no image.
A feedback tool spread across surfaces rather than depth: live websites, mobile apps, images and PDFs in one place, sold per user with a free tier.
Strength. Feedback on mobile apps, images and PDFs as well as live websites, with Trello, Slack, Asana and Jira already connected on the free plan.
Limitation. No console logs, no network requests and no session replay appear anywhere on its site, and its annual price is painted in by a script rather than served in the page.
BugHerd is the nearest match for the same agency workflow, with unlimited guests and unlimited projects on every plan and feedback on designs and PDFs as well as live sites. Marker.io fits when the reporters are many and the internal seats are few. Ruttl is the one with a free plan. Notarus is the one to look at if what a report is missing is the console, the network log and the session behind it.
No. There is a 14 day trial that asks for no card, and the cheapest paid plan is Pro at $49 a month, or $39 billed annually, for 2 team members. Among the options here, Ruttl has a free Basic plan and Notarus runs a free plan with unlimited seats; BugHerd and Marker.io are paid only.
Its pricing page publishes two different annual totals for Pro, $470 in one block and $396 in another, and we are not going to average them or pick the flattering one. The Business total is consistent at $864. Until Feedbucket settles the Pro figure, the monthly prices are the ones worth planning against: $49 for Pro and $89 for Business.
Notarus carries console logs, network requests and session replay on its free plan. Marker.io adds all three from Team, at $199 a month or $149 billed annually. Ruttl states none of the three anywhere on its site, and BugHerd does not state session replay on its pricing page. Feedbucket lists console logs under Business and publishes neither replay nor network capture.
Free includes evidence capture, session replay and the MCP server.