Feedbucket is the pick for unlimited projects; Marker.io is the pick when developers need replay and console. Both entry plans are $39 a month billed annually: Feedbucket's Pro for 2 team members and unlimited projects, Marker.io's Starter for 3 users, 10 projects and 5,000 page views. Marker.io's replay and console start at Team, $149 billed annually.
A website feedback tool for agencies, built so the client never needs an account and the agency works from inside Asana or Jira rather than from the tool itself.
A widget and browser extension aimed at agencies reporting bugs on client sites, priced by page views as well as by seat.
Feedbucket is a website feedback tool for agencies, built so the client never needs an account and the agency works from inside Asana or Jira rather than from the tool. Client reporters and projects are unlimited on every plan, video is recorded in the browser by the reporter from the entry plan, and the trackers connect from Pro. The ladder has two rungs, two team members and then twenty five, and its pricing page publishes two different annual totals for Pro.
Marker.io is a widget and browser extension for agencies reporting bugs on client sites, priced on seats, projects and page views at once. Reporters are a free, unlimited role with no dashboard who follow their issue from a link. Session replay, console logs, network requests and the Jira integration begin at Team; its help centre states it has no built-in screen recording and suggests attaching a Loom link. Its MCP server is documented as open to every plan while in beta.
Feedbucket Marker.ioEvery claim about Feedbucket and Marker.io comes from each vendor's own public materials, read on 13 September 2026. Products change; check each vendor's site before deciding. Pending cells are unresearched, not zero.
The third option
Notarus keeps the shared premise, that a reporter never costs a seat, and removes the tier the technical record waits behind. Session replay, console logs, network requests, the environment and a screen recording are all on the free plan, with unlimited seats and 5 projects, and page views are a degrade ceiling rather than a quota: past it the widget keeps accepting feedback and stops recording new replay until the month ends. A named client access follows a project with its own key and is never a member of the organisation.
It is a web widget and nothing else. There is no Figma, PDF or image review, no mobile SDK, and no Zendesk or Intercom integration, which is where Marker.io's Business plan keeps an edge. There is also no agency plan; the three plans are the same for everyone.
All three prices, SAML included, are printed on the pricing page.
On an annual bill the entry plans match at $39 a month; monthly, Feedbucket's Pro is $49 against Marker.io's Starter at $59. They carry different things: two team members and unlimited projects on Feedbucket, three users, ten projects and 5,000 page views on Marker.io. The bigger difference is what the next tier buys, replay and console on Marker.io's Team at $149 billed annually, and twenty five seats on Feedbucket's Business at $89.
Marker.io does, from its Team plan at $199 a month or $149 billed annually, alongside console logs and network requests. Feedbucket does not state session replay anywhere on its pricing, features or home pages, and lists console logs under Business while its feature pages describe them as automatic, an inconsistency we have not resolved.
Feedbucket. Video feedback is recorded in the browser by the reporter, with or without audio, from its entry plan. Marker.io's help centre states it has no built-in screen recording and suggests recording with another tool and attaching the link.
Yes. Feedbucket's client reporters are unlimited on every plan and need no account. Marker.io's reporters are free and unlimited on every plan, never count as a seat, and follow their own issue from a link. The difference is on the agency side: Feedbucket counts team members, Marker.io counts users, projects and page views.
No. Marker.io's Jira integration and its issue sync begin at Team, $199 a month or $149 billed annually; Starter connects GitHub, Trello, Asana, ClickUp, Monday, Linear and more. Feedbucket connects Jira, along with Asana, ClickUp, Trello, Basecamp, Monday, GitHub, Linear and GitLab, from its Pro plan at $49 a month or $39 billed annually. An agency whose clients' bugs must land in Jira from the first month pays less for that on Feedbucket.
Notarus vs Feedbucket Feedbucket alternatives Notarus vs Marker.io Marker.io alternatives 
Marker.io vs BugHerd BugHerd vs Feedbucket 
Feedbucket vs Gleap 
Feedbucket vs Jam 
Feedbucket vs Pastel 
Feedbucket vs Ruttl 
Feedbucket vs Userback 
Feedbucket vs Usersnap 
Feedbucket vs Ybug Gleap vs Marker.io Jam vs Marker.io Marker.io vs Pastel Marker.io vs Ruttl Marker.io vs Userback Marker.io vs Usersnap Marker.io vs Ybug
Markup.io vs Marker.io Markup.io vs Feedbucket5 projects and unlimited seats, session replay included. No card.
