Feedbucket vs Pastel

Feedbucket is for the bug round; Pastel is for the approval round. Feedbucket sends client bug reports to Asana or Jira from $39 a month billed annually, with no free plan. Pastel reviews live sites through its own proxy, plus PDFs, emails and images, with unlimited guest reviewers and a free plan of 1 active canvas.

  • Reviewed
  • 3 pending verification
Feedbucket

Feedbucket

A website feedback tool for agencies, built so the client never needs an account and the agency works from inside Asana or Jira rather than from the tool itself.

Free plan
None. A 14 day trial, no card required
Paid plan entry
Pro, $49 a month or $39 billed annually, for 2 team members and unlimited projects
What it takes feedback on
Live websites, through a widget installed on the site
Pastel

Pastel

A review and approval tool for creative work, layering comments over a live site through its own proxy as well as over PDFs, emails and uploaded images.

Free plan
Free Forever: 1 user and 1 active canvas, with unlimited guest reviewers
Paid plan entry
Pro, $35 a month or $29 billed annually, for 2 users and 3 active canvases
What it takes feedback on
Live websites through its own proxy, plus PDFs, emails, uploaded images and uploaded video

What are Feedbucket and Pastel built for?

Feedbucket

Feedbucket

Feedbucket is a website feedback tool for web agencies. The client leaves feedback on the staging site with nothing to install, and the team handles it from inside its project management tool, with Asana, Jira, ClickUp, Trello, Basecamp, Monday, GitHub, Linear and GitLab connected from the entry plan. Client reporters and projects are unlimited; the plan counts team members, two on Pro and twenty five on Business.

Pastel

Pastel

Pastel is a review and approval tool for creative work. It layers comments over a live website through its own proxy, with no code snippet or extension to install, and over PDFs, emails, uploaded images and uploaded video. Guest reviewers are unlimited on every plan including the free one, which holds a single active canvas. Its MCP server is described as reading a comment, making the change in the codebase and resolving the comment itself.

How do Feedbucket and Pastel compare head to head?

Dimension
Feedbucket Feedbucket
Pastel Pastel
Free plan
None. A 14 day trial, no card required
Free Forever: 1 user and 1 active canvas, with unlimited guest reviewers
Paid plan entry
Pro, $49 a month or $39 billed annually, for 2 team members and unlimited projects
Pro, $35 a month or $29 billed annually, for 2 users and 3 active canvases
What it takes feedback on
Live websites, through a widget installed on the site
Live websites through its own proxy, plus PDFs, emails, uploaded images and uploaded video
Installing on the reviewed site
A widget installed on the site; the client installs nothing
Nothing on the site: comments are layered through Pastel's proxy
Reviewers
Client reporters unlimited on every plan, no account needed
Guest reviewers unlimited on every plan, the free one included
Session replay
Not stated anywhere on its pricing, features or home pages Pending verification
Not offered. Pastel states it captures no replay
Console and network capture
Console logs listed under Business, $89 a month or $72 billed annually; network requests not stated Pending verification
Not offered on any plan
Screen recording
Video feedback, recorded in the browser by the reporter, from Pro
Uploaded video is reviewed; recording is not stated on the plans page Pending verification
Issue tracker integrations
Asana, Jira, ClickUp, Trello, Basecamp, Monday, GitHub, Linear, GitLab and more, from Pro
Trello, Asana, Jira, ClickUp and Monday from Team, $119 a month or $99 billed annually. GitHub and Linear are not listed
MCP server
An MCP connector, listed from the Pro plan
An agent that makes the change in the codebase, replies with what it did and resolves the comment. Names Cursor, Claude and ChatGPT
Where the count bites
Team members: 2 on Pro, then 25 on Business
Active canvases: 1 on Free, 3 on Pro, unlimited from Team
SAML single sign-on
Listed as coming soon on its Enterprise plan
Enterprise, $450 a month from 10 users

Every claim about Feedbucket and Pastel comes from each vendor's own public materials, read on 13 September 2026. Products change; check each vendor's site before deciding. Pending cells are unresearched, not zero.

When should you choose Feedbucket, and when Pastel?

Feedbucket

Choose Feedbucket when

  • The comment is a bug, and it has to become a ticket. Feedbucket sends it to Asana, Jira, ClickUp, GitHub or Linear from its entry plan; Pastel's trackers wait for Team and it lists neither GitHub nor Linear.
  • You review many sites at once. Feedbucket's projects are unlimited on every plan; Pastel counts active canvases until Team.
  • The client should record what went wrong. Feedbucket records screen and audio in the browser from Pro; Pastel reviews uploaded video and does not state a recorder.
Pastel

Choose Pastel when

  • The work being approved is a PDF, an email or an image as often as a page. Pastel reviews all of them; Feedbucket is a widget on a website.
  • You cannot put a script on the site you are reviewing. Pastel layers comments through its own proxy with nothing to install; Feedbucket needs its widget on the page.
  • You want to start free and stay there for light use. Pastel's free plan carries one user, one active canvas and unlimited guest reviewers; Feedbucket has no free plan.
  • You want the agent to make the change, not file it. Pastel describes its MCP server making the edit in the codebase and resolving the comment; Feedbucket's connector is listed as an integration from Pro.
Notarus

The third option

Where does Notarus fit?

Notarus is for the round Feedbucket serves, a bug on a live page, and it attaches what Pastel states it lacks and Feedbucket holds to Business or leaves unstated: session replay, console logs, network requests and the environment on every report, on a free plan with unlimited seats and 5 projects. A named client access follows the project without a seat, and every panel action is also an MCP tool.

It is no use for Pastel's round. It takes feedback on a live web page only, never a PDF, an email, an image or a Figma file, and it needs its widget on the page rather than a proxy in front of it. There is no mobile SDK and no Intercom or Zendesk integration.

The pricing page carries the three prices and the limits behind them.

Seats on Free
Unlimited
Projects on Free
5
Replay retention
30 days
Session replay
On Free
Console and network
Every report
MCP server
Every plan

What do buyers ask about Feedbucket vs Pastel?

Which is cheaper, Feedbucket or Pastel?

Pastel, at the bottom: its free plan runs indefinitely with one active canvas, and its Pro is $35 a month or $29 billed annually for two users and three canvases. Feedbucket has no free plan and its Pro is $49 a month or $39 billed annually for two team members. Pastel's Team at $119 a month is where its canvases stop being counted and its trackers appear.

Can Pastel send a comment to Jira like Feedbucket does?

Only from Team, at $119 a month or $99 billed annually, where Trello, Asana, Jira, ClickUp and Monday connect. Feedbucket connects those and more, including GitHub, Linear and GitLab, from its entry plan. Pastel lists neither GitHub nor Linear on any plan.

Does either capture the console?

Pastel does not, on any plan, and says so. Feedbucket lists console logs under Business at $89 a month while its feature pages describe them as captured automatically, and the two statements have not been reconciled on its site. Feedbucket states neither session replay nor network requests; Pastel states it captures neither.

Which one for a design agency?

Pastel, if the deliverable is approved rather than fixed: emails, PDFs and images are reviewed beside the live site, reviewers are unlimited on every plan, and nothing is installed on the client's site. Feedbucket is the better tool once the site is live and the comments are bugs bound for a tracker.

Does Pastel need a script on the site like Feedbucket does?

No. Pastel layers its comments over a live website through its own proxy, so nothing is installed on the site being reviewed, and it reviews PDFs, emails, uploaded images and uploaded video the same way. Feedbucket needs its widget installed on the site; the client installs nothing and needs no account, but the agency adds the script. That is what separates them for a page you cannot touch: Pastel reviews it, Feedbucket cannot. Notarus is on Feedbucket's side and needs its widget on the page.

Or try the third option on the free plan.

5 projects and unlimited seats, session replay included. No card.

<script src="…/widget.js" data-key="pb_pub_…">