Markup.io is for approving files with many reviewers; Feedbucket is for a two-person agency fixing staging sites. Neither makes the client sign up. Markup.io sells a workspace at $79 a month with unlimited members. Feedbucket is $39 a month billed annually for two team members, with browser video and Asana and Jira named on Pro.
A review tool for files and websites, sold by workspace rather than by seat, where collaborators join as guests without registering and more than thirty file types, video included, take comments.
A website feedback tool for agencies, built so the client never needs an account and the agency works from inside Asana or Jira rather than from the tool itself.
Markup.io is a review tool for files and websites, sold by workspace rather than by seat. Every plan carries unlimited members, admins and guests, collaborators join without registering, and comments go on any of more than thirty file types, video included. Its site does not mention console logs, network requests or session replay; its Chrome extension attaches a screenshot to a comment, and the integrations are described by category, with the full list unreachable on the day it was read.
Feedbucket is a website feedback tool for agencies, built so the client never needs an account or an extension and the agency works from inside Asana or Jira rather than from the tool itself. Client reporters and projects are unlimited on every plan, a browser recording of screen and audio comes with the entry tier, and console logs are listed under Business, though its feature pages describe them as automatic. Session replay and network capture are not stated anywhere on its site.
Markup.io FeedbucketEvery claim about Markup.io and Feedbucket comes from each vendor's own public materials, read on 13 September 2026. Products change; check each vendor's site before deciding. Pending cells are unresearched, not zero.
The third option
Notarus keeps what both tools get right, the client who never signs up, and adds what neither states clearly: session replay, console logs, network requests and the environment on every report, on the free plan, with unlimited seats and 5 projects. A named client access follows a project with its own key and is never a member. Every panel action is also an MCP tool.
It reviews no files. A live web page is the only surface: no PDF, no video, no image, no mobile SDK, and no Intercom or Zendesk integration. Markup.io's thirty file types are not something Notarus competes with.
Feedbucket's team count jumps from two to twenty five and Markup.io's upper tiers are quoted; Notarus counts no seats and lists all three prices on the pricing page.
Feedbucket at the entry: Pro is $49 a month or $39 billed annually for two team members and unlimited projects, against Markup.io's $79 a month for a workspace. Feedbucket's next tier is Business at $89 a month or $72 billed annually for twenty five members, so a team of three to twenty four is on Business: $89 a month against Markup.io's $79, though Business at $72 billed annually undercuts it. Markup.io's workspace carries unlimited people at either size.
No. It is the one thing the two products agree on. Feedbucket states that client reporters are unlimited on every plan and need neither an account nor an extension. Markup.io states that collaborators join as guests with no registration required and that every plan supports unlimited users.
Feedbucket lists console logs under its Business plan, while its feature pages describe them as captured automatically, and the two statements have not been reconciled on its side. Markup.io's site does not mention console logs, network requests, browser metadata or session replay anywhere.
Feedbucket, from its Pro plan, alongside Asana, ClickUp, Trello, Basecamp, Monday, GitHub, Linear and GitLab. Markup.io's pricing page says it works with project management tools without naming one, and the page it links to for the full list did not open on the day it was read.
In Feedbucket, yes, from its Pro plan at $39 a month billed annually: the reporter records screen and audio in the browser, with nothing installed and no account. Markup.io's site does not state screen recording; its Chrome extension attaches a screenshot to a comment, and uploaded video files can be reviewed as one of its more than thirty file types, so the page marks it pending. Neither states session replay. For a client showing rather than describing a bug, Feedbucket is the documented route.
Markup.io alternatives
Notarus vs Feedbucket Feedbucket alternatives
BugHerd vs Feedbucket 
Feedbucket vs Gleap 
Feedbucket vs Jam 
Feedbucket vs Marker.io 
Feedbucket vs Pastel 
Feedbucket vs Ruttl 
Feedbucket vs Userback 
Feedbucket vs Usersnap 
Feedbucket vs Ybug Markup.io vs BugHerd Markup.io vs Marker.io Markup.io vs Pastel Markup.io vs Ruttl Markup.io vs Userback Markup.io vs Usersnap5 projects and unlimited seats, session replay included. No card.
