Studios reviewing designs and sites with a long list of clients
Standard, $50 a month or $42 billed annually, for 5 members
Marker.io alternatives, with prices and limits
The closest alternatives to Marker.io are BugHerd, Userback, Feedbucket and Notarus. BugHerd matches it for agency work and also takes feedback on Figma files and PDFs. Userback and Notarus both run ongoing free plans, which Marker.io does not. Feedbucket keeps client reporters and projects unlimited from its entry plan. Marker.io stays the better answer when the people filing bugs are clients who must never occupy a seat.
- 4 options
- Prices read 13 September 2026
-
-
Teams that want two free seats now and a ladder to climb later
Team, $39 a month or $29 billed annually, for 5 seats and 5 projects
-
Teams whose traffic grows faster than their headcount, and who want replay and console capture without a second plan
Pro, $19 a month, for unlimited seats and 20 projects
-
Agencies of one or two people with a long list of clients
Pro, $49 a month or $39 billed annually, for 2 team members and unlimited projects
The options, side by side
Tool
Free tier
Entry paid price
Best for
None, though guests and projects are unlimited on every paid plan
Standard, $50 a month or $42 billed annually, for 5 members
Studios reviewing designs and sites with a long list of clients
Free Forever: 2 seats, 2 projects, and feedback stays visible for 7 days
Team, $39 a month or $29 billed annually, for 5 seats and 5 projects
Teams that want two free seats now and a ladder to climb later
Notarus unlimited seats, 5 projects, with session replay and the full MCP server included
Pro, $19 a month, for unlimited seats and 20 projects
Teams whose traffic grows faster than their headcount, and who want replay and console capture without a second plan
None. A 14 day trial, no card required
Pro, $49 a month or $39 billed annually, for 2 team members and unlimited projects
Agencies of one or two people with a long list of clients
Prices and plan contents read from each vendor's own pricing page on 13 September 2026.
Why teams look past Marker.io
The usual reason is what the entry plan leaves out. Session replay, console logs and network requests all begin at Team, $199 a month or $149 billed annually, so a team on Starter, at $59 a month or $39 billed annually, forwards a screenshot and a browser string and asks the developer to reproduce the rest.
The second is where Jira sits. GitHub, Trello, Asana, ClickUp, Monday, Linear, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket are all on Starter, and Jira is not: it arrives with Team, together with two-way issue sync. A team buying a feedback tool so that a client comment becomes a Jira ticket is on the second plan from the first day.
The third is that traffic is metered alongside the seats. Starter allows 5,000 page views a month and 3 users, Team allows 25,000 and 15, so a busy month on a client's site can move the plan even when nobody new has joined the team.
What each one is good at, and where it stops
BugHerd
A pin-on-the-page feedback tool for agencies and studios, sold by team members with clients thrown in free.
Strength. Unlimited guests and unlimited projects on every plan, and feedback works on Figma designs, PDFs and images rather than only on a live site.
Limitation. The project trackers most teams already run, Jira, Linear, Asana, ClickUp and Monday, are held back to the Premium plan at $150 a month. Extra members cost $8 each a month on top.
Userback
A feedback platform with a four-step ladder, opening up AI insights, replay and mobile SDKs as a team moves up it.
Strength. A mobile SDK on Business Plus for native apps, integrations with Intercom and Zendesk so feedback lands where a support team already works, and MCP connectors from the Team plan for giving an AI assistant context on feedback.
Limitation. Session replay and the developer tools that capture console and network activity start at Business, $99 a month or $79 billed annually. On the free plan feedback disappears from view after 7 days.
Notarus
A widget, a fixed four-stage board, and an MCP server that exposes every action the panel can take.
Strength. Session replay, console, network and environment arrive on the free plan rather than on a paid tier, unlimited seats on every plan including that one, clients follow the work through a portal access that is not a member and never uses a seat, and every panel action is an MCP tool as a shipping rule, so an agent can work the board a person works.
Limitation. No mobile SDK at all, so a native app is out of scope, and no Intercom or Zendesk integration. What it takes feedback on is a live web page and nothing else: no Figma file, no PDF and no image.
Feedbucket
A website feedback tool for agencies, built so the client never needs an account and the agency works from inside Asana or Jira rather than from the tool itself.
Strength. Unlimited client reporters and unlimited projects on every plan, and a browser recording of screen and audio from the entry tier with nothing to install.
Limitation. Console logs are listed under Business, $89 a month or $72 billed annually, and the entry plan carries two team members before jumping straight to twenty five.
When Marker.io is still the right answer
- The people filing bugs are clients rather than staff. Marker.io's own pricing page states that reporters are free and unlimited, and that holds from the cheapest plan rather than from a tier, so a long client list costs nothing in seats.
- Your issues live in GitLab, Azure DevOps or Bitbucket. All three are on Marker.io's Starter plan, and Notarus connects to none of them.
- Feedback has to land in Zendesk or Intercom. Marker.io connects both on Business, which is the plan quoted rather than listed and is billed annually only.
- You are a small agency and want a plan shaped for one. Marker.io runs a separate Agency plan at $129 a month, or $99 billed annually, and none of the options below has an equivalent of it.
Common questions
What is the best alternative to Marker.io?
BugHerd is the nearest match for the same agency workflow, and it also takes feedback on Figma files, PDFs and images. Feedbucket is the one to weigh if unlimited clients and unlimited projects on the entry plan is what you are buying. Userback and Notarus are the two with ongoing free plans. Notarus is the answer if the reason for leaving is that replay and the console sit on the Team plan.
Does Marker.io have a free plan?
No. It runs a 15 day trial that asks for no card, and the first paid plan is Starter at $59 a month, or $39 billed annually, for 3 users and up to 10 projects. Of the options here, Userback keeps a Free Forever plan with two seats and Notarus keeps one with unlimited seats; BugHerd and Feedbucket are paid only.
Can Marker.io record the reporter's screen?
Not on its own. Its help centre states that Marker.io does not currently have a built-in screen recording feature, and suggests recording elsewhere and pasting the link into the issue. Of the options here, Notarus includes screen recording on its free plan, and Feedbucket records screen and audio in the browser from its entry plan with nothing to install.
Which Marker.io alternatives include session replay without an upgrade?
Notarus includes it on the free plan, with console logs, network requests and the reporter's environment beside it. Userback includes it from Business, $99 a month or $79 billed annually. BugHerd and Feedbucket do not state session replay on their pricing pages. On Marker.io it begins at Team, and a recording whose session never became an issue is discarded after 15 minutes.
Other tools people compare
Start collecting website feedback with evidence.
Free includes evidence capture, session replay and the MCP server.