Markup.io is for approving creative work with a crowd of reviewers; Marker.io is for getting a reproducible bug from a client site into Jira. Markup.io sells a workspace at $79 a month with unlimited members and guests. Marker.io starts at $39 a month billed annually for three users, with session replay and console logs from Team.
A review tool for files and websites, sold by workspace rather than by seat, where collaborators join as guests without registering and more than thirty file types, video included, take comments.
A widget and browser extension aimed at agencies reporting bugs on client sites, priced by page views as well as by seat.
Markup.io is a review tool for files and websites, sold by workspace rather than by seat. Every plan carries unlimited members, admins and guests, collaborators join without registering, and comments go on any of more than thirty file types, video included. Its site does not mention console logs, network requests, browser metadata or session replay; the Chrome extension attaches a screenshot to a comment. The integrations are described by category rather than by name.
Marker.io is a widget and browser extension aimed at agencies reporting bugs on client sites, priced on seats, projects and page views at once. Reporters are a free, unlimited role with no dashboard who follow their own issue from a link. Session replay, console logs, network requests and the Jira integration start at Team. Its help centre states it has no built-in screen recording, and its MCP server is documented as open to every plan while in beta.
Markup.io Marker.ioEvery claim about Markup.io and Marker.io comes from each vendor's own public materials, read on 13 September 2026. Products change; check each vendor's site before deciding. Pending cells are unresearched, not zero.
The third option
Notarus sits on Marker.io's side of the line, the bug rather than the file, and moves the evidence down the ladder: session replay, console logs, network requests, the environment and a screen recording arrive with every report on the free plan, with unlimited seats and 5 projects. Every panel action is also an MCP tool, so an agent can work the board a person works.
It shares Marker.io's limit and adds none of Markup.io's breadth. Feedback is taken on a live web page only: no PDF, no video file, no image, no Figma design, and no mobile SDK. There is no Zendesk or Intercom integration either.
The person reporting never uses a seat, and all three prices sit on the pricing page.
No. They are two companies and two products that happen to share most of a name. Markup.io, at markup.io, is a review and approval tool for files and websites sold by workspace. Marker.io, at marker.io, is a bug-reporting widget and browser extension for agencies, sold by seat, project and page views.
Marker.io at the entry, at $39 a month billed annually or $59 monthly for three users and ten projects, against Markup.io's $79 a month for a workspace. The comparison changes with the group: Markup.io's workspace carries unlimited members and guests, while Marker.io's Team, where replay and console begin, is $149 a month billed annually.
No. Marker.io lists session replay, console logs and network requests on its Team and Business plans. Markup.io's site does not mention console logs, network requests, browser metadata or session replay anywhere; its Chrome extension attaches a screenshot to a comment.
Yes on both. Markup.io states that collaborators join as guests with no registration required and that every plan supports unlimited users. Marker.io's reporters are a free and unlimited role who submit through the widget and follow their issue from a link, without a dashboard or a seat.
Marker.io does, from its Team plan at $199 a month or $149 billed annually, where Jira and issue sync begin; GitHub, Trello, Asana, ClickUp, Monday and Linear are available from Starter. Markup.io describes its integrations as project management, content management and design tools without naming a single one, so whether Jira is among them is not stated on its site. An agency that files every bug in Jira has a documented path on Marker.io and an unanswered question on Markup.io.
Markup.io alternatives
Notarus vs Marker.io Marker.io alternatives 
Marker.io vs BugHerd
Feedbucket vs Marker.io
Gleap vs Marker.io
Jam vs Marker.io 
Marker.io vs Pastel 
Marker.io vs Ruttl 
Marker.io vs Userback 
Marker.io vs Usersnap 
Marker.io vs Ybug Markup.io vs BugHerd Markup.io vs Pastel Markup.io vs Ruttl Markup.io vs Userback Markup.io vs Usersnap Markup.io vs Feedbucket5 projects and unlimited seats, session replay included. No card.
