Markup.io is for a large group and many file types; Ruttl is for a small team wanting a free start and named integrations. Markup.io has no free plan; its workspace is $79 a month with unlimited members. Ruttl starts free, then $18 a user a month, with Trello, Slack, Asana and Jira on the free plan.
A review tool for files and websites, sold by workspace rather than by seat, where collaborators join as guests without registering and more than thirty file types, video included, take comments.
A feedback tool spread across surfaces rather than depth: live websites, mobile apps, images and PDFs in one place, sold per user with a free tier.
Markup.io is a review tool for files and websites, sold by workspace rather than by seat. Every plan carries unlimited members, admins and guests, collaborators join without registering, and comments go on any of more than thirty file types, video included. Its site does not mention console logs, network requests or session replay; its Chrome extension attaches a screenshot to a comment, and its integrations are described by category rather than by name.
Ruttl is a feedback tool spread across surfaces: live websites, mobile apps through an NPM package, images and PDFs, in one place under one login, sold per user with a free tier and unlimited guests commenting from a shared link. No console logs, network requests or session replay appear anywhere on its site. Its MCP server reads tickets and marks a thread resolved once the fix ships, and its annual price is painted in by a script rather than served in the page.
Markup.io RuttlEvery claim about Markup.io and Ruttl comes from each vendor's own public materials, read on 13 September 2026. Products change; check each vendor's site before deciding. Pending cells are unresearched, not zero.
The third option
Neither of these two says why the page broke, only where. Notarus records that on the free plan: session replay, console logs, network requests and the environment come with every report, with unlimited seats and 5 projects, and every panel action is also an MCP tool.
It covers one surface where these cover several. A live web page only: no mobile app, no image, no PDF and no video file, and no Intercom or Zendesk. If the feedback is about a design file or an app, this page's two tools are the ones to weigh.
Where Ruttl's annual figure is painted in by a script and Markup.io's upper tiers are quoted, Notarus prints its three prices on the pricing page and does not count seats on any of them.
Yes. Ruttl's Basic plan is free, with 1 project and 5 pages and Trello, Slack, Asana and Jira connected, though its pricing page gives two different user counts for it. Markup.io no longer offers a free plan; its 14 day trial asks for a card, and a lapsed trial is restricted to the five most recent MarkUps and 10 GB.
It depends on headcount. Ruttl's Pro is $18 a month per user, so three people pay $54 and ten pay $180 on the published figure. Markup.io's Pro is $79 a month for a workspace with unlimited members and guests. Up to four users Ruttl is cheaper, at $72 for four; from five, at $90, Markup.io is, and past 50 users Ruttl's price becomes a conversation.
No. Ruttl's site mentions no console logs, no network requests and no session replay anywhere, and its video is a clip the reporter uploads. Markup.io's site does not mention any of the three either; its Chrome extension attaches a screenshot to the comment.
Ruttl does, on its free plan, alongside Trello, Slack and Asana, with ClickUp on Pro and Monday listed as coming soon. Markup.io's pricing page says it works with project management, content management and design tools without naming one, and the page it links to for the full list did not open on the day it was read.
Ruttl can. It lists mobile apps, through an NPM package, beside live websites, images and PDFs, all under one login. Markup.io does not state a mobile SDK on its site; what it names is live websites and more than thirty file types, video included, so a video file can be uploaded and commented on, but the app itself is not a surface. Notarus offers no mobile SDK either. For feedback inside a mobile app, Ruttl is the only one of the two that names it.
Markup.io alternatives
Notarus vs Ruttl Ruttl alternatives
BugHerd vs Ruttl
Feedbucket vs Ruttl
Gleap vs Ruttl
Jam vs Ruttl
Marker.io vs Ruttl
Pastel vs Ruttl 
Ruttl vs Userback 
Ruttl vs Usersnap 
Ruttl vs Ybug Markup.io vs BugHerd Markup.io vs Marker.io Markup.io vs Pastel Markup.io vs Userback Markup.io vs Usersnap Markup.io vs Feedbucket5 projects and unlimited seats, session replay included. No card.
